Search Site
Menu
Author Archive
barker law firm
1 - 5 of 5
Page 1 of 1

Governor issues new Executive Orders on Saturday

On Saturday, March 21, 2010, New Jersey Governor Philip Murphy issued two new Executive Order in a continued effort to respond to the Coronavirus pandemic. EO No. 107 issues a “stay at home” order commanding all resident to stay at home or in their place of residence unless leaving for the specific reasons providing in Read More

Read More

Compliance with the Executive Order No. 108

As part of EO No. 108, law firms, like all other non-essential retail businesses, have been ordered to have their workforce telework “whenever practicable” with the exception of employees who cannot perform the functions of their job via teleworking. We, at Barker, Gelfand, James & Sarvas, have already made the transition to teleworking for all Read More

Read More

State v. Orlando Trinidad

This seems applicable for our defense of civil rights cases, albeit the decision comes from a criminal case. The victim’s mention of high profile police brutality cases, which happened twice in the trial in this case, should have been excluded. Even though the Court does not disagree that there was relevance to the references to Read More

Read More

The New Jersey Supreme Court Rules that MVR Recordings Constituted Criminal Investigatory Records and thus were Not Required to be Produced Pursuant to New Jersey’s Open Public Records Act

SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court. In the interest of brevity, portions of any opinion may not have been summarized.) John Paff v. Read More

Read More

Are District Courts getting the qualified immunity analysis wrong?

On April 2, 2018, the Supreme Court, decided a qualified immunity case, Kisela v. Hughes, wherein the Court reversed a Ninth Circuit decision which denied summary judgment to a police officer based on qualified immunity.1 In finding that the officer was entitled to qualified immunity the Supreme Court noted that “(t]his Court has repeatedly told Read More

Read More
1 - 5 of 5
Page 1 of 1
Contact us

Quick Contact Form